Would you help me? Sardar Patel sought help from Jehangir Tata (J R D Tata)

Would you help me?  Sardar Patel sought help from Jehangir Tata (J R D Tata)

Poona,
9th October 1945

My Dear Jehangir,

It is more than three years since we met, i.e., before my arrest in August 1942 in Bombay. Since my release, I have been mostly confined to this clinic except for short intervals when urgent public duty calls me away. I wanted to meet you when I was in Bombay for three days on the occasion of the A. I. C. C. meeting. But I could not find time owing to pressure of work.

I am writing this to you in the hope that you may be able to assist me in an urgent matter of public importance. In the coming Central Assembly Elections, the Congress has to set up two candidates from the Bombay City General Constituency. There is no difficulty in getting both the seats; but I want your help in securing the services of an expert. If you can permit and persuada Dr. John Matthai (Economist, Member, India Tariff Board, Joined Tata Sons - 1940) to agree to stand as a Congress nominee and contest one of these seats on its behalf, you would be doing a great service to the country's cause His services in the Central Assembly at this critical juncture would be of immense value.If he would accept a Congress ticket, I would see that there is no difficulty in winning the seat in the elections.

As the date of nominations is drawing near, I would request you to send me a reply as soon as possible.

I have written this on my own behalf, but if you agree, I will place it before my Committee.

Yours Sincerely,
Vallabhbhai Patel

Shri J. R. D. Tata,
Bombay

Reference : This was Sardar - G M Nandurkar - Maniben Patel
Photo - Photo Division of India

jrd tata, jrd tata motors, jrd tata youtube, jrd tata news, jrd tata hindi, jrd tata pdf, jrd tata wikipedia, jrd tata airlines, jrd tata school, jrd tata ppt, tata sky login, tata cliq, tata motors, tata sky, tata harrier, tata motors share price, tata, tata login, tata altroz, tata youtube, 

The Ministry in Bombay : B. G. Kher to Vallabhbhai Patel

The Ministry in Bombay : B. G. Kher to Vallabhbhai Patel

I have had discussion with my colleagues as to the subject which you referred into in your letters dated. 3rd April 1939.

No ultimatum was given by the Bombay Ministry to the Governor, or indication to the grave implications of the situation arising out of Mahatmaji’s fast. But it pointed out to him the state of tension in the country. I think we should have failed in our duty if we had not done so and pointed out the necessity of prompt action to save Gandhiji’s life. No communication whatsoever was sent to the Government of India.

It is not necessary for me to state what I and our Cabinet might have done if the Government of India had not interfered in the matter of Gandhiji’s fast. No doubt the situation that event would have been serious, and before resigning it might have become necessary to make a reference either to the Parliamentary Sub-Committee, or to the Working Committee or the President. I would like to tell you frankly that I do not think that I have done anything which I should not have been done. In matters relating to rural administration, we have to take prompt decisions and so long as we act in consonance with the principles of our party, neither the President nor the Working Committee nor the Parliamentary Sub-Committee should desire to interfere. I am perfectly certain that your decisions would have been the same as ours.

I wish to assure you that there was no intention either deliberately or otherwise to ignore you. No information was sent because there was nothing to send information about. I had discussed this matter with His Excellency they Governor. The press reports, as you know, very often attribute such steps to the Ministry as the press desire them to take and put on scare headlines. I think the best course is to trust the several Ministries and not the press. I am sure you will at once believe me when I say that I am incapable of indiscipline, it is ingrained in the whole of my being. I have not acted contrary to the needs either of duty or of discipline.

I think the Khare episode has no application at all to this occasion. I have given you my reaction to your letter frankly as you desired me to do so.

As regards your circular letter dated 3 April, without going into the merits of the allegations that several ministers canvassed, my colleagues and I are of the view that Congressmen, by accepting office do not cease to be Congressmen and, in the domestic affairs of the Congress, are entitled to act exactly as other members of the organisation in all matters connected with it.

We do not also subscribe to the view that the Ministers are like the members of a civil service in an administration. They are non-political agents of a policy laid down by politicians who form the Government. That view would deny to the Ministers the rights of a four anna member and would be destructive of the confidence which the Ministers enjoy by reason of their being called upon to perform the arduous and responsible duties of their office. Ref. Towards Freedom - 1939 Pg. 78